Voter ID Cannot Be Treated As Conclusive Proof of Citizenship Under Assam Accord: Guwahati High Court

Team Latestly

Guwahati, February 17: A division bench of Guwahati High Court has held that a voter ID cannot be treated as conclusive proof of citizenship under the Assam Accord of 1985. The Guwahati High Court made the observation while dismissing a writ petition filed by Munindra Biswas who challenged the decision of a foreigners tribunal to declare him a foreigner last July. Biswas submitted a voter list from 1997 which has his name to prove citizenship. NRC Slip Up: How Final List And Data Related to Assam National Register of Citizens Disappeared From

Also Read | Shaheen Bagh Protesters Begin March to Meet Amit Shah Over CAA-NRC, Heavy Security Outside Home Minister's Residence

According to Biswas, his grandfather migrated to Assam from West Bengal's Nadia district in 1965 and settled in Tinsukia. The foreign tribunal had refused to accept him as a resident of Assam even as he submitted a registered sale deed for a plot of land purchased by his father in Tinsukia in 1970. Biswas had also submitted an electoral roll from 1997. Declared "foreigner", Biswas then challenged the tribunal's order in Guwahati High Court. Why Citizenship Amendment Act+NRC Raise Fear And Concerns: A Multi-Dimensional Take.

After the hearing, Justice Manojit Bhuyan and Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia upheld the foreign tribunal's decision, an electoral photo identity card (EPIC) or voter ID cannot be treated as conclusive proof of citizenship. "Regarding electoral photo identity card, the court in the case of Md Babul Islam versus state of Assam (2016) had held that a photo identity card is not a proof of citizenship," the bench held.

Also Read | Punjab: First Sniffer Dog Training Center at Attari in Amritsar | Live Breaking News Headlines & Updates, February 15, 2020

The court asserted that since no voters' lists prior to 1997 were submitted by the petitioner the tribunal was right in deducing that he failed to prove his parents entered Assam prior to January 1, 1966. Biswas has now been declared a foreigner of post-1971 stream.

The Assam Accord says: "All persons who came to Assam prior to January 1, 1966, including those amongst them whose name appeared on the electoral rolls used in 1967 elections, shall be regularised. Those who came between 1966 and 25 March, 1971, would be disenfranchised for 10 years, meaning that they were to get voting rights only after expiry of 10 years from the date of their detection or declaration as foreigner."

Interestingly, recently a court in Maharashtra held that a voter ID can be treated as proof of citizenship. "The birth certificate, domicile certificate, bonafide certificate, passport, etc can be relied upon to establish the origin of any person," a magistrate court said, while acquitting a couple suspected to be illegal Bangladeshi immigrants.

The court added, "Even the election card can be said to be a sufficient proof of citizenship as while applying for the election card or voting card, a person has to file declaration with the authority in view of Form 6 of Peoples Representation Act to the authority that he is citizen of India and if the declaration is found false, he is liable for punishment."