Despite Tough Talk on North Korea, Trump’s Options Limited

The meet marks a potentially dramatic breakthrough in the North Korea nuclear standoff.

US President Donald Trump has employed tough rhetoric in response to North Korea’s recent missile tests, but the new president’s options appear limited in dealing with a challenge that has vexed his Oval Office predecessors.

Most options fall into four categories: economic sanctions, covert action, diplomatic negotiations and military force.

Economic Sanctions

North Korea is already among the most heavily sanctioned nations, facing numerous strictures to limit its ability to conduct commerce, participate in international finance and trade in weapons and other contraband.

Despite those measures, “most analysts agree that US and multilateral sanctions have not prevented North Korea from advancing its fledgling nuclear weapons capability,” said a report last year from the US Congressional Research Service.

Reuters reported last week that Trump is focusing his North Korea strategy for now on tougher sanctions, possibly including an oil embargo, banning its airline, intercepting cargo ships and punishing Chinese banks doing business with Pyongyang, US officials said.

The US officials expressed doubt about how much farther China is willing to go to pressure its defiant North Korean ally – despite Beijing’s increasing frustration with Pyongyang’s missile launches and nuclear tests.

Beijing has long feared that economic collapse in North Korea would flood China with refugees and leave it to deal with chaos on the Korean peninsula.

Covert Action

The United States, with help from Israel, temporarily set back Iran’s nuclear programme via a computer virus called Stuxnet, which destroyed thousands of centrifuges used to enrich uranium.

The United States tried, but failed, to deploy a version of the Stuxnet virus to attack North Korea’s nuclear weapons programme in 2009-2010, Reuters reported in 2015.

One former high-ranking intelligence official briefed on the programme said the effort was stymied by North Korea’s utter secrecy and extreme isolation of its communications systems.

That same secrecy is responsible for what US officials have consistently described as limited US intelligence about the North Korean government’s inner workings.

Another semi-covert approach would be for Washington to use electronic warfare or cyber attacks to disable North Korean missiles during or shortly after their launch.

The high failure rate of the North’s missile tests has prompted speculation that the United States is already doing so. The New York Times reported last month that the US military is working hard on missile defences that would involve sabotage rather than traditional anti-missile interceptors.


The Trump administration has not indicated publicly that it is interested in reviving moribund diplomatic negotiations with North Korea over its nuclear and missile programmes.

There have been no official negotiations for seven years. In February 2012, the United States and North Korea announced an agreement in which the North would suspend operations of its Yongbyon uranium enrichment plant, allow international inspectors to verify the suspension, and implement moratoriums on nuclear and long-range missile tests.

In return, North Korea would get badly needed food aid.

In April of that year, the North attempted to launch a satellite on a three-stage rocket in what Washington said was a violation of the agreement because of the rocket’s potential military uses.

While Pyongyang denied it had breached the agreement, the deal was suspended.

China, alarmed at rising US-North Korea tensions, on Saturday called for talks leading to the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula.

Military Force

Military options available to Trump range from a sea blockade aimed at enforcing sanctions to cruise missile strikes on nuclear and missile facilities to a broader campaign aimed at overthrowing leader Kim Jong Un.

How North Korea would respond to even a limited strike is unknown, but it threatened on Friday to “ruthlessly ravage” the United States if Washington chooses to attack.

Any US military action brings severe risks for US ally South Korea.

“South Korea has some 20 million people within artillery range of North Korea,” retired ambassador Chris Hill, the top US envoy to talks with North Korea under President George W Bush, said on Sunday on ABC’s ‘This Week’ programme.

On the same programme, Trump national security adviser HR McMaster indicated military force is a last resort.

“It's time for us to undertake all actions we can, short of a military option, to try to resolve this peacefully,” he said.

Join The Quint on WhatsApp. Type “JOIN” and send to 9910181818.