Another SC judge recuses from hearing West Bengal-related case

·3-min read


Another SC judge recuses from hearing West Bengal-related case
Another SC judge recuses from hearing West Bengal-related case

22 Jun 2021: Another SC judge recuses from hearing West Bengal-related case

Justice Aniruddha Bose, a Supreme Court Judge, today withdrew from hearing the petition filed by West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee in connection with the infamous Narada bribery case. "I do not want to hear this case," Justice Bose said, according to NDTV. Banerjee and West Bengal Law Minister Moloy Ghatak have urged the top court to consider their affidavits in this case.

Details: Bench headed by Justice Vineet Saran to hear the case

Justice Hemant Gupta, presiding over the bench, then asked the registry to post the case before another bench. Now, a bench led by Justice Vineet Saran will hear the pleas on Friday, reports say. "It will be listed before some other bench. Brother Bose has some reservations," Justice Gupta said in the court, according to Bar & Bench.

Plea: What is the plea by Banerjee and Ghatak?

Banerjee and Ghatak have challenged a June 9 order of the Calcutta High Court, which had refused to accept their affidavits in the case. The affidavits present their stance on the request of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to transfer the case out of West Bengal on grounds of pressure from the state government. The CBI is probing this case.

High Court: Calcutta High Court had refused to accept the affidavits

In its order, the Calcutta HC had said the CM and the state government did not file the affidavits at the right time, waiting for the "arguments in the case to be substantially completed." The court added it could not allow them to "file the affidavits at their own whims and fancies." "It is nothing else but filling the lacunae or supporting the accused."

Fact: CBI was allowed to file additional affidavits, pleas allege

The appeal before the Supreme Court said the rights of the state government and the Law Minister should not be denied, "especially when CBI had been allowed to file additional affidavits at different stages," reported Bar & Bench.

CBI's take: CBI says case should be transferred from Bengal

The CBI has contended that hearing in the case should be transferred from West Bengal to a court of the central agency. It has argued that Banerjee's protest at the CBI office at a time when four leaders of her party, the Trinamool Congress, were being arrested in the case hindered their working and influenced court proceedings in the matter.

Case: What is the Narada bribery case?

The case involves a 2014 sting operation by Narada News founder Mathew Samuel for over two years in West Bengal. The alleged tapes released by Samuel showed a dozen of Trinamool leaders accepting cash as bribe in return for some favors. Four prominent politicians of West Bengal, including two sitting Ministers, were last month arrested in this case by the CBI.

Fact: Earlier, another SC judge had withdrawn from Bengal-related case

Earlier, Indira Banerjee, another Supreme Court judge, had dropped out of hearing a petition on allegations of post-poll violence in West Bengal. "I have some personal difficulty in hearing this," the Judge, who is from Kolkata, had said.

The news article, Another SC judge recuses from hearing West Bengal-related case appeared first on NewsBytes.

Also see: SC judge Indira Banerjee recuses from WB post-poll violence case
Mamata Banerjee challenges Suvendu Adhikari's Nandigram win, hearing next week
CBI withdraws Supreme Court appeal opposing TMC leaders' house arrest
Read more on India by NewsBytes.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting