Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Big Question: Equal division of property?

    The Planning Commission's working group on Women's Agency and Empowerment  have suggested that all assets acquired by a married couple or a couple living together should be classified as joint property and should be divided equally in the event of separation or desertion. The panel asserted that a woman needs to be recognized as an equal partner in a marriage, and her contribution to the household must be valued.
     
    In a country where gender inequality has long-defined society and its laws, and the wealthy can use pre-nups to protect their assets on the pegs of fidelity and faithfulness, it is also a society where most women are not gainfully employed, and have no sense of security. Women often give up their careers and means of livelihood when they start a family, trading high-income jobs to be stay-at-home mothers – a role with no monetary rewards.


    Is this a fair law whose time has come?
    Share your opinion in the comments section below.

    Related:

    * Panel wants a couple's assets to be treated as joint property

    More from the Big Question - Your opinion matters!

     
    • Hriday  •  Kolkata, West Bengal  •  3 months ago
      There should be one more clause. Only those assets which are earned by that couple should be divided. No division should be allowed in ancestral property.
      • Chu 3 months ago
        U R rit !
      • Arun K S 3 months ago
        What if the wife deserts the husband?
      • Ramesh 3 months ago
        Good point Hriday. In Hindu laws, the ancestral properties are treated under HUF, the husband being the Karta. The laws mentioned above must be for individuals.
    • Yogin Koppikar  •  Bangalore, Karnataka  •  2 months ago
      All properties should be shared equally by husband and wife.
    • sri  •  Chennai, Tamil Nadu  •  3 months ago
      I Go with the view of the Planning commission's verdict.
    • Kavitha  •  Bangalore, Karnataka  •  3 months ago
      Yeah..I agree with this.At least for this reason they will not think of separation......
    • Princy  •  3 months ago
      yeah....i agree since in earning assets both wife and husband contribute equally....Even if a woman doesn't earn she takes care of household chores, health of the family members , timely provides food and other necessities which enables her husband to work and earn.Without her it would have been really difficult.
      • Riya 3 months ago
        yeah men are always dependent on women ...no matter what they say......
      • Sudipto 3 months ago
        Its true. But is the converse true Riya?
      • Dipankar 3 months ago
        yah men are dependant....so they should get wife's 50% property to be independent after separation.
    • chuck  •  Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh  •  3 months ago
      Wonder why laws are ever made in this country. Can anyone tell why only the citizens have to follow laws and not the leaders, etc?. Only the President and Prime Minister should have immunity from the law while in service and the rest should be brought under the ambit of Indian Law.Does anyone agree with this view.
      • Chu 3 months ago
        Let's not hv discs which R not spontaneous & distant related
    • atit  •  Sydney, Australia  •  3 months ago
      Any property should be divided based on percentages what husband paid and wife paid respectively.. for compensation of household job... there is already Alimony and maintenance laws.
      • neena abel 3 months ago
        'Household Job' - You make a wife seem like a servant....... Nasty. There is a difference between a Wife and a servant . Most women in India dont realise it. In the name of Culture and custom. I know that 75% of women in india would runaway given a chance to freedom. Being treated a servants and baby machines.
      • morisika 3 months ago
        Neena, the law says so, by the way when shall you run away from your husb?
    • sanjay  •  3 months ago
      What, if SEPARATION is desired by the lady????????????
      • neena abel 3 months ago
        If the wife finds out her husband is having an affair and he still refuses to let her go and keeps her and il treats her , Then i think this law is good to go. If they want to get seperation within a year then , this has to be thought through to avoid those brides who marry to make money over divorce from getting any share .
    • sanju  •  3 months ago
      I think this is not fare.This will increase divorce rate in the country.Marriage should be like a contract between two person.If they are not compatible with each other they should simply depart or govt should provide an instrument which tell us that these couple is compatible.
    • Jayesh  •  Indore, Madhya Pradesh  •  3 months ago
      Will the government will have guts to apply this rule for every couple irrespective of religion or cast. If so then this move is welcome.
    • nash  •  Dubai, United Arab Emirates  •  3 months ago
      it will give one more reason to greedy wife and their family to desert husbands and their family for money,,will increase the rate of blackmailing,, life should be lived with faith and trust instead of calculating money and assets,,its an another weapon of money extortion, i have seen wives where they always their inlaws and husband with 498a and other dv laws..if its been used for justice its ok,,but majority of laws in india are being misused,,shame
    • Prakash  •  Panaji, Goa  •  3 months ago
      I believe most of the defaulting men are from the middle class to poor background. Also most of the women defaulting come from middle class to rich background. So the laws like these wont help the society in general. In india education is very important. Illeteracy must be eradicated to bring up a sensible and sober society. Laws are more misused than used for good. The governments in the past and present have neglected to invest in educational schemes. Even after RTE, i m not sure how much the government is interested in educating the masses.
    • Hriday  •  Kolkata, West Bengal  •  3 months ago
      Exactly Prabhu ...You remember the dialog from "Pyaar ka Panchnama":--
      "Behind every successful man there is a woman is true but the forgot to say that behind every unsuccessful man there is a woman and clearly the number of successful man is far lesser than unsuccessful"
      That's the reality
    • prabhu r  •  3 months ago
      "Behind very successful man there is a woman"yes its true but how far for example from age 0-30 by mothers guided success after 30-60+end by wife guided fails and vice versa in other case......hope is this women success create and fails through itself....what true proverb.....from those days itself........kaliyugam no comments from men........
    • m  •  3 months ago
      I am a women but I really want such Hazardous Planning Commissions to be Banned by Government!!! They make laws for money hungry womens who can fulfill their greed by ripping people of their emotions and savings. I am against such biased laws. Those Monster kind of ladies make a loot and harass others(which include other old aged womens) using governmental policies. Please Stop this Nonsense!!
    • Chandra Shekhar  •  Mangalore, Karnataka  •  3 months ago
      correct, if woman is not working and depends on husband.
    • RAJ  •  Mumbai, Maharashtra  •  3 months ago
      No wonder why most of the guys are either enjoying affairs without either living in / marrying or turning gays. Keep it up India frame all such bullshit laws.
    • prafulla  •  Bangalore, Karnataka  •  3 months ago
      I will never support
    • luv h  •  Surat, Gujarat  •  3 months ago
      Remove 498a First
    • Vijay  •  3 months ago
      Make 20000 Rs p.m just working on your computer for few hours a day. To read more go to. ---------------------------------------------
      goo.gl/Ulz6K