Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    PM offers to appear before PAC, BJP's Joshi says will decide

    New Delhi, Dec 27 (IANS) As the opposition continued with its demand for a JPC probe into the 2G spectrum scam, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh Monday wrote to parliament's Public Accounts Committee expressing his willingness to appear before it on the issue. Panel head Murli Manohar Joshi said the committee would take an 'appropriate decision at an appropriate time'.

    The main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was not impressed by the prime minister's offer and insisted on its demand for a joint parliamentary committee probe. The Congress hit back, saying the PAC was chaired by a BJP leader and the opposition party should demand a JPC only if it didn't believe in Joshi's abilities.

    The prime minister Monday followed on his assurance to the Congress plenary a week ago and wrote to the PAC chairman conveying his willingness to appear before it in connection with the 2G spectrum scandal. He said in his letter that there was no precedent for the prime minister appearing before a PAC, but he was ready to do so.

    'To the best of my knowledge, the PAC takes evidence from the secretaries of the departments concerned or the heads of departments or the public sector undertakings,' Manmohan Singh wrote in his letter to Joshi.

    'However, in view of the recent propaganda that the prime minister is unwilling to be questioned by a parliamentary committee, I would like to inform you that I am willing to appear before the PAC should the committee choose to seek clarifications from the prime minister, though I believe there is no precedent of the prime minister appearing before a PAC,' the prime minister wrote.

    On the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG)'s report into the issue of licences and allocation of 2G spectrum, the prime minister said his office has provided the relevant documents sought by the PAC.

    Responding to the prime minister's offer, Joshi said an appropriate decision will be taken.

    'An appropriate decision will be taken at an appropriate time depending on the collective wisdom of members,' Joshi told mediapersons here after the end of the committee meeting.

    CAG Vinod Rai was present at Monday's PAC meeting.

    Joshi said it was wrong to say that the CAG had been summoned by the committee. He said CAG was a part of the panel and assists it in its work.

    He said at the last meeting the members wanted to understand some finer and technical points of the CAG report, which looked into the 2G spectrum allocation controversy, and these were explained at the meeting Monday.

    Joshi said the work of PAC was not tied to CAG report and it can look into any issue relating to misuse of public money.

    BJP leaders, who are steadfast in demand of JPC investigation into the 2G spectrum controversy, have maintained that the PAC basically looks into the CAG report.

    'Whether government constitutes JPC or not. No comment from PAC,' Joshi said. Answering queries, he said if there is a need, the panel will look into the 2G spectrum allocation from 2001.

    Joshi said the CAG report had calculated presumptive loss to exchequer from 2G spectrum allocation in three different ways and the committee may decide on one of these models or choose another model.

    Answering a query, he said no minister can be called by PAC under the rules unless the speaker gives permission.

    Joshi also denied apprehensions that the committee was working at a fast pace on the 2G spectrum issue. He said that PAC had met held meetings in different months.

    The government has rejected the opposition's demand for JPC, saying a PAC was looking into it and a multi-level investigation was also being conducted simultaneously.

    The BJP, insisting on a JPC probe, said: 'Unless there is a JPC, there can't be a conclusion. If the prime minister is clear, why is the government shying away from a JPC,' BJP spokesman Syed Shahnawaz Hussain told reporters.

    Hitting back at the BJP, the Congress said that the PAC was chaired by BJP leader Joshi and the rival party should demand a JPC only if it didn't believe in his abilities.

    'Today, the prime minister said he will depose before the PAC...If the BJP doesn't believe in the abilities of Mr. Joshi and the PAC, we can't help,' Congress spokesman Shakeel Ahmed said.

     

    5 comments

    • INDIAN WIZARD  •  1 year 5 months ago
      According to media reports most of the Scam amount or corruption amount is deposited in ten different foreign banks. Indian people are trying to find in India the unavailable most of the scam money or corruption money due to the reason that the money is it seems was already deposited in ten different foreign banks - according to the media reports. Raja is Raja in Scam and DMK needs to be congratulated. Indian people should vote DMK & UPA for another 10 to 15 years so that the entire backward community comes forward with 3G SCAM 5G SCAM 10G SCAM 25G SCAM 50G SCAM and 100G SCAM. The Government of India should reserve 99% of SCAM money to the backward community so that the backward community comes forward with 3G SCAM 5G SCAM 10G SCAM 25G SCAM 50G SCAM 100G SCAM.
    • Buddha Tera Baap  •  1 year 5 months ago
      Congress is saying that PAC is chaired by BJP leader Murli Manohar Joshi and they should demand JPC only when they have no faith in his ability. This tactics has worked for Congress for last 50 years and will not work any more. My counter question is why they are opposing JPC which would be chaired by a Congress leader. Do not have they faith in their own leader? And if they have so much faith in Mr Joshi then make him chairman of JPC but for god's sake do not try to block the investigation by JPC on flimsy grounds.
    • RAM GOPAL  •  1 year 5 months ago
      It's no matter that who is heading the PAC or JPC, the question is the integrity of the investigation. The common man wants that the truth should come our but all the political parties are beating about the bush, bad luck of country.
    • SWAMINATHAN.P  •  1 year 5 months ago
      how muchinformation PMO has hidden under the carpet.

      CAG report submitted to Parliament is not prepared over-night. Let us understand how strong our governance and how the powerfl people have silenced the entire set of governance.
      Basically - every officials have to perform as per the rules & procedures set-out apart from this they have to exercise their powers as a man of ordinary prudance and safe guard the government as if they safeguard their own property.
      secondly, higher officials must ensure transparancy and disallow discriminative measures to cause losses to government.
      There is an internal audit who function under the control of Financial Advisors and head of department - who clear every proposal with objections if any.
      Then there is an external audit - who function under Ministr/Department Financial Advisors/Secretary - most independant function.
      Then only CAG comes into picture - with the following action.
      Residential Auditors give preliminary enquiry which has to be answered by the respective officials with the approval of the head department.
      At this stage majority of Quiiry will get deopped.
      Then comes Inspection Report which has to be answered by Head of the Department - Meantime CAG representatives will hold joint meeting where certain genuine errors get dropped with warnings.
      CAG verify Inspection repports and replies - then highest officials exports hold meetings with concerned officials and drorp minor cases -
      Then they prepare PARAGRAPH which is very serious issue - and dropping the case is next to impossible.
      At this stage Stage financial advisors, secretaries, head of the departments, exports, ministers, group of ministers will all get to know entire issue that grown.
      Only after all deliberation, CAG gives its final report to Parliament.
      By a ll means - CAG report is most scientific, impartial, authentic and very realiable.
      After a formal review by PAC - brief will be given to Parliament - mostly with vast powers Parliament drop the CAG repports in most cases.
      CAG have also an extra-ordinary power of bllocking cash flow to the concerned ministries - as on date CAG has ot uesed its fullest powers.

      Whether proverb [���Caesar���s wife should be above suspicion���] is a curse & disguise or bliss?

      In the [1st century BC] FICTION Pompeia 2nd WIFE of CAESAR is depicted as ���EMPTY HEADED��� and CAESAR marries her for POLITICAL EXPEDIENCY [not out of love].

      Caesar gave no evidence in a seduction case, but DIVORCED Pompeia with ruling ���Caesar���s wife must be above suspicion��� and this actually gave raise to a misnomer proverb.

      Dr. Manmohan Singh asserts like Caesar���s wife ���PM should be above suspicion.

      "If corruption is happening under his nose and if he is not doing anything, then naturally everyone will have suspicion that he is a participant in it." One cannot shake off his responsibility on the issue of corruption.
    • syed  •  1 year 5 months ago
      Incredible. It seems everyone including GoM, Ministers, Babhus, HoD's and officials are aware about the scam much before report is prepared (if there has to be discussion at different levels of the ministry ). Where does the BUG stops ???
    We apologize. An error has occurred. Please try again.
    Loading...