Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Pakistan fires defense secretary in growing crisis

    ISLAMABAD (AP) — Pakistan's prime minister fired the defense secretary Wednesday in a dispute over a memo sent to Washington that has enraged the army, escalating a crisis pitting the civilian government against the powerful military leadership.

    The army warned darkly of "grievous consequences" as a result of the standoff, which is hampering U.S. efforts to rebuild shattered ties with the nuclear-armed nation that are needed to negotiate an end to the war in neighboring Afghanistan. The tensions have consumed the ruling elite in a country that is struggling to overcome economic turmoil and a bloody al-Qaida fueled insurgency.

    The developments were a sign of near-open conflict between the army, which has often seized power in the country's six-decade history. Relations between President Asif Ali Zardari and the generals have never been good, but have soured dramatically in recent months.

    Instability has dogged the government since it took office in 2008 after a 10-year army dictatorship, and there have been frequent, wrong predictions of its demise. While unpopular, the government has a solid majority in parliament and it's unclear whether the army or the Supreme Court have the stomach to unseat it.

    The unsigned memo sent to Washington asks for its help in reining in the power of the military in exchange for favorable security policies. It was allegedly masterminded by Pakistan' envoy to Washington, who resigned in a failed attempt to stem the fallout.

    The affair has outraged the army, which has portrayed it as a treasonous threat to national security.

    Acting under army pressure, the Supreme Court ordered a probe to establish whether the memo had been sanctioned by Zardari, a prospect that could lead to impeachment hearings. As part of the investigation, army chief Gen. Ashfaq Pervez Kayani and the head of the main spy agency, Lt. Gen. Ahmed Shuja Pasha, said in statements submitted to the court that the memo was genuine and part of a conspiracy against the army.

    Prime Minister Yousuf Reza Gilani said in an interview to a Chinese newspaper this week that Kayani and Pasha had violated the constitution by submitting the statements. The interview was also published by Pakistan's state-run news agency. The army denied the men's actions were illegal, and said in a statement that Gilani's allegations had "very serious ramifications with potentially grievous consequences for the country." It did not elaborate.

    Gilani's office later said that Defense Secretary Naeem Khalid Lodhi, a retired general and army loyalist seen as a bridge between the high-command and the civilian government, was dismissed for "gross misconduct and illegal action." He was replaced with Nargis Sethi, who is close to Gilani, the statement said.

    Gilani said Lodhi had been fired because he failed to inform the defense secretary about Kayani's and Pasha's statements to the court.

    In a move that some Pakistani media outfits speculated was somehow connected with the growing crisis, the army announced it had appointed a new commander for the "111 Brigade," which is responsible for security in Islamabad and Rawalpindi and has in the past carried out coups. The army said the posting was part of a "routine" rotation.

    The defense secretary's signature is needed on letters to appoint or dismiss military leaders, and Lodhi's firing triggered talk on Pakistani television that Gilani was seeking to dismiss Kayani by installing a loyalist to the position.

    Cabinet minister Khursheed Shah told reporters this was nonsense and that the current "rise in temperature" was mostly media hype. "The government doesn't want any kind of confrontation with any state institutions," he said.

    On Tuesday, the Supreme Court, which is believed to be hostile to the government and has been used by the army in the past to sanction coups, warned it could dismiss Gilani unless he followed court orders to pursue a once-shelved corruption case against Zardari. It called Gilani dishonest and said he had violated his oath of office by ignoring the order.

    It ordered the government to attend proceedings next week to explain its inaction.

    "I think the lines have been drawn, now it depends on who fires the next shot," said Rasul Bakhsh Rais, professor of political science at Lahore University of Management Sciences. "It is a three dimensional war: the judiciary, the political executive and the armed forces."

    Observers say political pressure is growing to topple the government before Senate elections scheduled for March. Regional and national lawmakers are expected to vote along party lines, giving Zardari's party a majority in the upper house, which would ensure him significant political power for the next six years.

    The country also is to hold general elections next year, although some are pushing for the vote to be held sooner.

    That prospect now appears increasingly likely, and could be one way out of the crisis.

    Gilani said he thought the Senate elections would take place on time, and declared "democracy will continue in the country and democracy is a destiny for Pakistan."

    Some pundits have speculated that the ruling party itself may want to be deposed by the army, believing it could then get a sympathy vote in new elections and fire up its base by presenting itself as a victim. Having presided over near economic collapse, widespread corruption and poor or nonexistent governance, it can't relish the prospect of running on its record.

    Most analysts say the army has little appetite for a direct coup but is happy to allow the Supreme Court to end the current setup via "constitutional" means. "We can't rule out those impulses (an army coup). They are rooted in history, but right now the army have decided not to. Rather they will stay by the sidelines and watch the court," the analyst Rais said.

    The turmoil is coinciding with a near-break down in relations with the United States following American airstrikes on the Afghan border last November that killed two dozen Pakistani soldiers. Islamabad shut down vital supply routes into Afghanistan and forced the U.S. to vacate Shamsi Air Base in southwestern Baluchistan province.

    Late Wednesday, gunmen shot and killed 14 paramilitary Pakistani soldiers, a security official said, before escaping back into the hills. Baluchistan is home to separatist rebels and Islamist militants, and both routinely attack state forces in the poor, remote region.

     

    24 comments

    • Paul  •  Homewood, United States  •  4 months ago
      I say pull our money and troops out of that entire part of the world and let them all kill each other like they've been doing since the start of time. Bring our money and troops home and use our tax dollars where they belong, in the usa.
      • Harris 4 months ago
        You clearly have no education or understanding of this country. What does this transition of the govt. has anything to do with YOU PULLING OUT your money and army?Your army has actually de-stabilized that country in the first place. There were no bombings in Pakistan before 2011.Seriously, educate yourself first and then start speaking from your #$%$
      • Grant 4 months ago
        What do you consider the start of time?
      • Paul 4 months ago
        Harris, the one here who does not understand is you. Americans have supplied that country with over a billion dollars. That money is needed at home not over there so they can support the terrorists. They have been taking our foreign aid and cooperating with the very terrorists that we have been giving them money to get rid of the terrorist in their country.
    • Christopher  •  Sacramento, United States  •  4 months ago
      Pupet strings looking for a pupet dictator.

      Who will serve the military's interests in extending the conflicts?
    • Moises  •  Los Angeles, United States  •  4 months ago
      In Dictatorship Pakistan, Army orders you!
      • Mike 4 months ago
        Yes. The Army was allowed to become economically independent, and that gave it leverage to begin pushing the government around.
    • caesar  •  4 months ago
      A failed state run by those talking through both sides of their mouths.
    • NSR  •  4 months ago
      Boots takes orders from civilian government,, not other way.
      Fire Kayani and Pasha for investigating the duely and democratically elected government without its knowledge.
      Where did Kayani and Pasha got permission to investage the memo?
      Much better if Supreme Court CJ Chaudhry has the courage to fire Kayani and Pasha to show that he walks the talks.
      Why the supreme court is siding with army - because it is afraid to act against it.
      • Harris 4 months ago
        It is probably siding with the army because ARMY IS RIGHT! Are you one of the very few idiots who actually voted for PPP? If not, then how could you support these crooks?
      • Mike 4 months ago
        Why would you think military rule is preferable to civilian rule? Especially since ISI is the brainchild of the Army, and the instigator of most terrorism in central and southern Asia?
      • Ali 4 months ago
        Generally speaking, a common man in Pakistan want economic security and stability in the country. Military government bring political stability which, in return, bring economic stability. Historically speaking, economic growth rate in Pakistan is always much higher (average 6%-7%) during the military government than during the civilian rule (3%-3.5%). A lot of people are saying that, economically speaking, the previous government under Gen. Musharraf was much better than the current one under Zardari. Zardari's government is extremely unpopular. Except for the un-educated rural population of the Sindh province, nobody will vote for him in the next election.
    • SaddleRock  •  4 months ago
      Fire Paneta too!!
      • Mike 4 months ago
        #$%$ straight. Gates and Panetta both have failed to roll back the disastrous reforms (DEforms?) that Rumsfeld wrought on the US armed forces.
    • vartanb  •  , Gujarat  •  4 months ago
      Now i think pakistan will have a new enemy which is its army against
      the government and zirdari will go away soon and with its pm too.
      This will start from inside the army and they do not think so yet.
      It will have a clean coup and no body will be killed and they take
      the two person in prison and will be trialed like mubarak.if musharraf
      returned to paskistan he will follow these two people in prison too.

      bye
      • Harris 4 months ago
        I don't think Musharraf would end up in prison with Zardari and Gillani, its actually one or the other!

        There is no comparison between Egypt and Pakistan political struggle!
      • Ali 4 months ago
        I think Musharraf should go to the prison and face charges against him. These charges are all politically motivated and ultimately, Musharraf will be found innocent.
    • Jack  •  4 months ago
      Civilian authorities will never gain real traction in Pakistan. The military is well established there, as well as the secret services, as they have been for decades.
    • cooldude  •  4 months ago
      USA is preparing for the next phase in Pak. They are waiting for Musharaff to return and put him in power. The plan is on course now.
    • Mike  •  4 months ago
      It's a f***ed up constitution that allows a supreme court to dismiss the prime minister.
    • George  •  4 months ago
      ❤DRONE WARS❤
    • S  •  4 months ago
      Puts banana republics to shame!
    • Shawn  •  4 months ago
      That is one scary place. Don't forget they have nuclear weapons.
    • Christopher  •  Sacramento, United States  •  4 months ago
      Pakistan is the Hub of The Axis of Evil
    • Michael  •  Glasgow, United States  •  4 months ago
      DON'T give the Pakis another cent. Send some troops to India if needed to help them. This #$%$ has to stop. Bring our dollars home and use them here, not to grow the government, but to pay down the debt. Also, Elect Ron Paul!
    • Elmo Blatch  •  Sunnyvale, United States  •  4 months ago
      The generals in Pakistan appear to be out of control and should be removed, there's something wrong when the military is dictating policy...it's like the tail wagging the dog.
    • Robert W  •  4 months ago
      The army serves the government in a democracy,There can be no "conspiracy",unless the there is a militiary dictatorship.Therefore the charge is illogical.
    • Adil  •  Lahore, Pakistan  •  4 months ago
      Despite complete lack of governace or no goverance and what appears to be intentional dismantling of state institutions, blatant corruption and bringing national economy to the point total collapse by Pakistan politicians , the patience shown by Pakistan army and the Supreme court clearly show that every one wants democracy. On the other hand feudal dominated political elites sone time use religion , some time use the slogan based on the promise to give bread, clothing and shelter ,call themseves the saviour of democracy . On top of every thing, due to geographical location, global and regional powers are also interfering i Pakistan internal affairs. If Imran PTI also fail, then country is ready for realy bloody revolution.
    • Watch thi..............  •  4 months ago
      My morning coffee will be highlighted by a report about everybody lobbing nukes at each other. The drive to ghannieland will end with a 300mi slide down a glasschute and ending with who can plow the furthest thru the desert before they stop.
    • divad41  •  4 months ago
      Pakistan sure like an insoluable problem..
    We apologize. An error has occurred. Please try again.
    Loading...