Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    NATO gives security to Afghans in eastern capital

    MEHTERLAM, Afghanistan (AP) — NATO handed over responsibility for the security of the capital of an eastern province to Afghan forces Tuesday, the latest step in a transition process that will lead to the withdrawal of all foreign combat troops by the end of 2014.

    The U.S.-led coalition has started a process of transferring security in parts of the country where they feel Afghan forces are strong enough to take control, although so far that has largely been restricted to provincial capitals as much of the country remains lawless and unstable after a decade of war.

    U.S. forces turned over control of Mehterlam, the capital of Laghman province, but they'll retain responsibility for the other areas in the predominantly Pashtun province that remain under the influence of the Taliban and other insurgent groups.

    NATO officials said the handover sent a powerful signal that progress is being made.

    "Above all, it is a tangible demonstration to the Afghan people of the growing capacity of this government and its increasing ability to improve citizen's lives," said Lt. Gen. James Bucknall, deputy commander of coalition forces.

    Mehterlam is one of seven areas being transferred to the Afghan government this month, the first phase in a three and-a-half year plan that will eventually see the entire country under Afghan control.

    On Sunday, the peaceful province of Bamiyan was handed over, while the transition process has begun in northern Panjshir. The two, which have seen little violence, are the only entire provinces to be handed over. The other provincial capitals in line to be transferred are Lashkar Gah in southern Afghanistan, Herat in the west and Mazer-e-Sharif in the north. Afghan forces will also take control of all of Kabul province except for the restive Surobi district.

    Violence has increased around the country since President Hamid Karzai announced on March 22 that government forces would take control of the seven areas.

    In the latest example, seven police officers were killed Monday at a checkpoint near Lashkar Gah, the capital of Helmand province that is among those slated to be handed over this month. Provincial spokesman Daoud Ahmadi said one of their colleagues killed them, then escaped in a police vehicle loaded with weapons.

    Much of the violence can be attributed to efforts by the Taliban to take back control of territory they lost to NATO and U.S. forces over the winter, but attacks also have spread to the east and along provinces that border Pakistan, where insurgents retain safe havens.

    In April, an attack in Mazar-i-Sharif killed 11 people — including seven foreign U.N. employees. Kabul also has experienced a rash of attacks, including the killing earlier this week of Jan Mohammad Khan, a close aide to Karzai and former governor of Uruzgan province.

    On Tuesday, twin explosions about 10 to 15 minutes apart killed two civilians in Ghazni city and wounded nine others, including an appellate judge, said Mohammad Hussain, deputy police chief in Ghazni province said.

    Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari flew to Kabul for a very short visit to pay his condolences to Karzai for the loss of his half brother, Ahmed Wali Karzai, who was assassinated last week in the southern city of Kandahar. A statement from Karzai's office said they also spoke about bilateral issues.

    Ashraf Ghani, a government official who is leading the transition effort, acknowledged that the security situation in the east had deteriorated even as it improved in the south.

    "We acknowledge that eastern Afghanistan has become insecure," Ghani said. But he stressed the importance of continuing the handover process, saying the persistent violence does not mean it should not be attempted in safe places.

    Karzai spokesman Waheed Omar said Monday that militants are launching attacks in the seven transition areas to try to disrupt the transition process, but he insisted that insurgents have been driven out of their strongholds and the intimidation campaign does not mean they are regaining strength.

    "The Taliban had strongholds in the south. Now they have lost those areas," he said. "They are not capable of standing and fighting in the battlefield."

     

    29 comments

    • Joker  •  10 months ago
      Keep on blaming the puppets, keep electing the puppets, and keep hoping that America will not fall.
      The Bilderberg Group is in charge and their global agenda will come to pass if it's not stopped by the people.
      Educate yourselves America!
      • johnsmith 10 months ago
        The Council on Foreign Relations, Tri-Lateral Commission, and some others are also involved.. The voters do not even ask a candidate about this. Sad.
      • pepe 10 months ago
        What worl do you live in.
      • pepe 10 months ago
        Americans don't even know where they are. They don't know where they walk. They don't know what they think. They think they are saving the world. And they can't even save them selfs from their manipulators. People from America keep dreaming. I only hope that you wake up on time or die on your dream. Because, dying on your dream will be better than waking up late.
    • joe70  •  10 months ago
      I wonder how long it will take the corrupt Afghan government to blow this??
    • Amerika  •  10 months ago
      NAT0 = US military and not much more, excepts those coming in to clean up the mess.
      • Josh 10 months ago
        Aye im US and you gotta give props to the work canada put in out there too
      • Amerika 10 months ago
        Sure, the 10 troops from Canada most definitely deserve props, but without the US, none of this would ever happen.
    • STEPHEN  •  10 months ago
      If NATO gives security to Afghans, that means there will be plenty of them killed soon. NATO is protecting Libyans, and they are living in terror as our bombs and missiles have rained down for four months, killing and wounding thousands of civilians. Obama is a terrorist.
      • GaBulldawg 10 months ago
        Dude..you need to move out of your grandmas basement and stop smokin that wacky weed....
    • Sherley  •  10 months ago
      This country has a $14.3 trillion dollar deficit.
      WHY ISN'T THIS WAR AND IRAQ, being stopped! WE CANNOT AFFORD THIS WAR! 10YRS. OUR LONGEST RUNNING WAR.
      Afghanistan is a country that is chained to its 13th century culture and religion.
      leave them alone, if they want freedom then let them choose how they want it.
      U.S. HAS A VERY LONG HISTORY OF PUTTING OUR TROOPS ON FOREIGN SOIL AND WE NEVER LEAVE!. KOREA +50YRS. JAPAN +60YRS. Afghanistan 10+yrs. WE'RE
      NOT LEAVING. SO OUR DEFICIT CANNOT COME DOWN
      Power, Control, Oil = Politics. GOT IN THIS MESS AROUND THE WORLD.
    • Wayne Y  •  10 months ago
      That's good,...now let's keep marching the rest of the US and NATO military out of Afghanistan and Iraq.
    • Andrey  •  10 months ago
      Watch YouTube: Illiteracy, drug use & desertions: National Afghanistan army strong enough?
    • Apollo01 N  •  10 months ago
      I support our troops and the ideals of their mission 100%. Unfortunately, what no one in the West seems to understand, once the U.S. and NATO pulls completely out of the region both Iraq and Afghanistan will revert back to their sectarian wars and tribal conflicts. In essence, the oppression, human rights violations, abuse of women, and pedophilia will rule those areas of the middle-east again.
      • Andrey 10 months ago
        and Why did u support those wars in the first place? )
      • jimm 10 months ago
        Yeah, except Afghanistan is not in the "Middle East". Also, Thailand, Cambodia, India, Brazil and Mexico probably have the worst pedophilia problems. USA ranks up there as well.
      • johnsmith 10 months ago
        I am so sorry but we have become an aggressor nation, not a lot better than some in the 1930s & 1940s. All for a stupid new world order. So sad.
    • Nemo  •  10 months ago
      Time to leave Afg to the Chinese. The AfghaniTalibani will not have to worry about the rules of engagement with the Chin. There are no rules with these infidels.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  10 months ago
      Go forward, Insurgents! usa is cr@pping blood, some more blood on the nose and usa quits!
      usa is on default, usa is Argentina + Greece!This is irreversible, the "new american century " was born dead!
    • Big L  •  10 months ago
      We got Osama, we can continue to fight Al Qaida with out trying to force the Afghanis into the 21st century. Time to go!
    • Hounddoggin  •  10 months ago
      Why should we give them security? Make them pay for it.
    • nn  •  10 months ago
      NATO is just an arm of the Military Industrial Complex
    • jones_howels_1222  •  10 months ago
      Get OUT of Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Yemen, etc., and stop starting wars on behalf of Israel. And end foreign aid. Not another dime adding to the US already-crushing debt burden! Act before the USA debt is downgraded to junk!

      We are never going to win our war on countries and meddling in regional disputes that are none of our business.
    • Fred  •  10 months ago
      I am glad that NATO can secure the protection of those in the east. NATO & the UN have much on their plate and they are helping bring peace to the world. Bless those that are with NATO.
    • Attar Umar  •  10 months ago
      Afghan forces !! Remember what we told you during your training ! I would advise now that we're (The US) and Now NATO , Kick as many Taliban and Al-quieda ass as you can, Steal and lie to them, execute them and there families, behead them, Fight fire with fire, Live by the Sword and FREEDOM ! Its the only way, God be with you and your victories against Satans Taliban and Al-Quieda !
    • johnsmith  •  10 months ago
      Nearly everything the west, including the USA does is to further the world into what the call "The New World Order". It is the reason for these illegal wars. The reason we do not seriously enforce our ImmigrationLaws. The reson for the global warming lies and intnded cap & trade law. I am sick.
    • lefty  •  10 months ago
      well, there goes the neighborhood!!!!!
    • WATCHEM  •  10 months ago
      NATO bombing in Libya has not ousted their leader. In fact, it looks as if he will be staying.
      Recognizing the rebel forces as the Libyan government could be a bit premature.
    • Young  •  10 months ago
      The so-call security responsibility transfer, in another word it may say NATO is defeated by Taliban