In an embarrassing volte face on Thursday, the government first disapproved decriminalization of gay sex - calling it 'highly immoral - and then sought to completely distance itself from the issue, leading to sharp criticism from the Supreme Court.
Earlier in the day, Additional Solicitor General P P Malhotra, who appeared for the Union Home Ministry, said that gay sex is against the Indian social order. He argued that such liberal practices that were practiced in the Western nations should not be allowed to prevail in India.
"Gay sex is highly immoral and against social order and there is high chance of spreading of diseases (like AIDS) through such acts," Malhotra said, arguing before the Supreme Court bench presided over by Justices S J Mukhopadhaya and G S Singhvi.
No sooner had the media reported that the government had dubbed gay sex 'immoral', than a host of pro-gay activists and civil society members slammed the government's stand.
With protests rising, the Home Ministry quickly did a U-turn and distanced itself from the Additional Solicitor General's argument. In a hurriedly drafted statement, even while court proceedings were still on, the Home Ministry said that it had not taken any position on the Delhi High Court order that decriminalized homosexuality.
The statement said: 'The Ministry of Home Affairs has not taken any position on homosexuality. The Ministry of Home Affairs has also not given any instruction apart from conveying the decision of the Cabinet.'
Explaining further, the statement said that the Attorney General had been only instructed to assist the Supreme Court in the matter. It also said that the matter had been discussed by the Cabinet and it had been decided that the government will not appeal against the Supreme Court judgement on the issue.
As soon as Additional Solicitor General Malhotra completed his argument in the Supreme Court, slamming gay sex, another ended his submissions after nearly four-hour proceedings, another Additional Solicitor General, Mohan Jain, submitted before the apex court that he had been instructed by the government to inform that the central government will not be taking any stand on the controversial issue.
This sudden and last-minute turnaround drew sharp reaction from the bench, which took strong exception to the government's stance.
The court said that the government has already advanced its arguments and that the SC would not take cognizance of the last-minute instructions.
Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends
Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.
To get started, firstLogin with Facebook
Latest Slideshows
Photos: Awesome Animals
30 photos - Fri 25 May, 2012A World Without Petrol
16 photos - Fri 25 May, 2012Amazing new species discovered this year
12 photos - Fri 25 May, 2012
@yahooindia on Twitter and Facebook
Explore Related Content
- Government withdraws 2G review plea
- 2G case: Apex court allows review petition wi …
- Haj subsidy has to go, SC tells govt
- Apex court hints Pakistani virologist may get …
- 2G: Apex court grants bail to Behura
- Supreme Court allows jailed Pak scientist Chishti …
- Notice to DGCA, home ministry on chopper firm's …
Latest Video
1 - 6 of 7303
We apologize. An error has occurred. Please try again.
News For You
Loading...


13 comments