Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Fighter punch stuns Britain

    London/New Delhi, Feb. 1: Rarely before have India's shopping preferences stirred such hand-wringing in Britain.

    UK Prime Minister David Cameron today expressed "disappointment" at the possibility of losing the deal from the Indian Air Force which has zeroed in on the French Rafale for placing the world's biggest order for fighter planes.

    Cameron, who had spared no effort to lobby hard for the job-generating order in the middle of a downturn, appeared to be keeping his hopes alive as the French deal has not yet been inked.

    "Of course, I will do everything I can ' as I have already ' to encourage the Indians to look at Typhoon, because I think it is such a good aircraft…. They have not yet awarded the contract," Cameron told MPs today. Britain's BAE has a 33 per cent stake in the four-nation consortium building the Eurofighter Typhoon.

    During Prime Minister's Questions in the Commons, Cameron added that the Typhoon was a "superb aircraft, far better than Rafale".

    Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is expected in London "within weeks". So, the two Prime Ministers will have a great deal to discuss ' there is the feeling in London that the UK is putting more into its relationship with India than the other way round. British pride ' or at least British tabloid pride ' is hurt. UK's Mail Online noted: "Well that's gratitude! We give India a �1bn in aid, THEY snub the UK and give France a �13bn jet contract."

    The IAF decision is a personal embarrassment for Cameron, who made growing trade with India a key foreign policy issue. He chose India for his first prominent foreign tour as Prime Minister in July 2010, taking six cabinet ministers and 39 business leaders, including BAE representatives.

    Although Cameron said that "we do not expect any job losses stemming from this decision", British ministers had said the programme could help over 200 local companies in the supply chain while supporting up to 5,000 jobs.

    One silver-lining is that EADS, the Eurofighter consortium, holds over 46 per cent stake in Rafale-maker Dassault Aviation. If Dassault does well, the consortium also gets to share the profit pie.

    The French bid was cheaper but analysts said political backing had been the key to victory. French President Nicolas Sarkozy described the decision as a vote of confidence in "the entire French economy", just 48 hours after he declared that Britain had no manufacturing sector to speak of.

    Barry Gardiner, Labour MP and chairperson of Labour Friends of India, used language less temperate than Cameron's. "I have today called for major reforms to UK Trade and Investment (UKTI), after the UK-based BAE Systems lost the contract," he said. "The loss of the Eurofighter contracts is another major blow to British industry, and comes at the worst possible time."

    "Today I have called for radical reform of the Indian high commission's role in promoting UK-India trade…. India House has now been without a high commissioner for seven months, something that would be inconceivable in Beijing or Washington. This demonstrates that the ministry for external affairs in Delhi no longer sees the UK as strategically vital to India's interests," said Gardiner.

    J. Bhagwati, India's ambassador in Brussels, has been appointed high commissioner to the UK and is expected to take up the new job this month.

    "Suffice it to say that the views and perspectives of the high commission are rather different from those expressed by Mr. Gardiner," responded a high commission spokesperson.

    Reports from the other Typhoon consortium members ' Italy, Spain and Germany ' suggested they have not given up. Germany's Spiegel Online said the "deal could ultimately collapse ' (for) in the past, all other talks to sell Dassault's Rafale aircraft abroad have failed."

    If the scramble turns dirty, it won't be long before mutterings of bribes and honey traps surface.

     

    5 comments

    • Neil  •  Mountain View, United States  •  3 months ago
      What would really stun Britain is if India and Pakistan made peace and there was no more need to buy these war machines.
      • JanZizka 3 months ago
        Wonder why the US needs NATO even though the cold war is over?
    • MCBC  •  Santa Clara, United States  •  3 months ago
      "UK's Mail Online noted: "Well that's gratitude! We give India a �1bn in aid, THEY snub the UK and give France a �13bn jet contract." - Utter rubbish!! UK is a beggar country, does not give any aid to India, nor does India need any!!
      • Ojas 3 months ago
        um actually it does....
        there was an outrage about india herself giving aid to the tune of millions to an african country, while herself receiving aid from england
    • rs  •  Gurgaon, Haryana  •  3 months ago
      Cameron deserves all the brickbats possible. They are all anti indian. He want jobs for his people but won't give work visa for Indian kids who have studied in UK. He is a ....
    • rs  •  Gurgaon, Haryana  •  3 months ago
      this stupid govt needs to get these sort of hit. they give millions of aid at USA' s beconing but have no money for their own people who have no jobs
    • Meenakshi  •  Chennai, Tamil Nadu  •  3 months ago
      Many experts in India and abroad expressed their concern about India's decision to buy Rafel Fighter plane. All these experts unanimously says that India as first preference should have gone for American F-22 or F-35. Eventhough these two are more expensive than the others, taking the long time benefit and the capability, this additional price will be nullified. As a second choice, India should have gone for BAE Tornodo. It is unfortunate that India only took into account the price and not the long time benefit or fighter capability. Every expert believes that Rafel is not even close to F-22, F-35 or Tornodo. Further, it is obvious that India is buying these fighters to counter China and not Pakistan. China has more advantage and strong on ground. To counter this imbalance, India should have strong air force. By selecting Rafel, Indian air force will not have significant advantage over Chinese. It is not too late to reconsider and correct the wrong decision. May be one or two but not experts are wsrong in their opinion.
      • MCBC 3 months ago
        Every expert has his own view and no two experts ever agree on such complex matters. So Rafale or Eurofighter decision is impossible to assess rationally. F-22 or F-35 type planes sold by US are useless for India. That is because of conditions of sale which require India to make an application in triplicate and get US permission every time the planes are to be used. US also blocks softwares and codes required to keep the planes flying, whenever the situation suits them.