Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Army Chief places additional documents in Supreme Court on age row

    New Delhi, Feb 9 (ANI): Chief of Army Staff, General V.K. Singh, has placed additional documents before the Supreme Court to support his case for restoring his date of birth as May 10, 1951.

    The documents that were filed on Wednesday relate to the Army Rules on Commissioning of officers.

    The fresh documents have been filed two days ahead of the crucial hearing on the petition filed by General Singh seeking to set aside two orders rejecting his plea.

    The Supreme Court had earlier on February 3 deferred the hearing in the ongoing standoff between the Army Chief and the government over the former's age till February 10.

    The apex court, which was hearing a petition by General Singh, questioned the manner in which the complaint about his age was rejected by the Defence Ministry in December last year.

    The court has asked the government whether it would withdraw this order since the decision-making process in rejecting the complaint was vitiated.

    The court also referred to the Attorney General's role in the matter and wanted to know how an officer who gave an opinion against the Army Chief in the first instance could also be involved in deciding on his complaint on the age issue.

    General V.K. Singh is believed to have questioned the government's decision to treat his date of birth, as May 10,1950 instead of May 10,1951 as claimed by him on the basis of his matriculation certificate and other documents, in his writ petition filed in the apex court.

    Reports in the media had earlier indicated that General V.K. Singh had written to the Government that his date of birth was May 10, 1951 and not 1950 as entered on the basis of his application when he entered the National Defence Academy.

    According to certain reports, the controversy stemmed from different sets of records in the Adjutant General and Military Secretary branches of the Indian Army Headquarters.

    While the Adjutant General's branch that deals with pay, perks and pensions maintains 1951 as his year of birth, the Military Secretary branch that deals with appointments and promotions has 1950 in its records.

    The Ministry of Defence had earlier rejected Army Chief's statutory complaint seeking a correction of his date of birth in the army records.

    According to reports, General Singh has been conveyed that that he will have to retire from service on May 31, 2012 on completion of his two-year tenure.

    General Singh, who has consistently claimed that he was born in 1951 and not 1950 as maintained, had in his statutory complaint asked the Defence Ministry to consider May 10, 1951 as his date of birth.

    The Army Chief had earlier filed the statutory complaint with Defence Minister A. K. Antony after the government issued an order on July 21 in which it said that it will consider May 10, 1950 as his date of birth. (ANI)

     

    4 comments

    • china venkateswararao  •  Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh  •  3 months ago
      The supporting document for the date of birth mentioned in the application is supposed to be the metriculation certificate which shows the date as 10th May 1951. The same has been recorded in the AG's office records. It is the failure of the dealing assistant in the personal branch to notice the error in the application and correct, hence it is the responsibility of the secretary incharge of the service to check the date of birth at the time of giving appointment orders and correct it. To coverup this failure the Government asked to correct the real DOB recorded in the AG's office records which is ony highhandedness of the administration. Hence the DOB recorded in the records of the AG's office based on the date of birth mentioned in the Metriculation certificate only should be treated as correct as claimed by the Army Chief, I feel.
    • umesh  •  New Delhi, Delhi  •  3 months ago
      Supream court must fix retirment of polticians also, sale buuddoos ke paav to kabr me latke huai aur fake democracy ke nam par overaged buddes desh ko loottne par lage huai ha
    • umesh  •  New Delhi, Delhi  •  3 months ago
      There must be file a PLP in Supreme court to fix the retirement age of polticians specially for ministers
    • early bird  •  Bangalore, Karnataka  •  3 months ago
      It must be probed weather the Army General was underaged while joing the Army as a Cadet. Did 1950 benefit him to join the Army then, was he under aged & took advantage.? He may be absolutely right at this point in time, to point out of a Ref. to Metriculation records as basis of correct Age, Such Ruling it self is more recent, & may not be holding 4 decades old story, but may be binding. Why should his teacher been interested to write 1 year senior, did he know something then, which many don't know now.
      • AMAR 3 months ago
        A young boy when appears for UPSC and then joins NDA/IMA/OTS and till he retires writes his date of birth in hundred of documents. How can a Army officer having served for 40 years does not know his date of birth.The MOD must know they have given a wrong message to the persons in uniform and retired. It is sad.